Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access
Total views : 215

Mapping the Potential Distribution of the Critically Endangered Forest Owlet Heteroglaux blewitti in India

Affiliations

  • Bombay Natural History Society, Hombill House, S.B. Singh Road, Mumbai 400 001, Maharashtra, India
  • Foundation for Ecological Conservation and Sustainable Development, Kolhapur 416 007, Maharashtra, India
  • Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, United States
  • College of Science, Sabah Al-Salem University City, Kuwait University, Shadadiya, Kuwait
  • RH-1,127/5, Ratan Park, Sus Road, Pashan, Pune 411 045, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


The Forest Owlet Heteroglaux blewitti was discovered and described scientifically in the 1870s, but went unrecorded since 1880s until 1997; it was believed to be extinct for 113 years. Although the species was rediscovered and has now been intensively studied, the limits of its geographic distribution remain poorly known. This study related known occurrences of the species to remote-sensed environmental landscape characteristics to generate ecological niche models that helped to identify potential distributional areas. We detected the species during field surveys at one location not known previously to hold populations of the species, and identified many other possible areas of distribution for the species using our niche models.

Keywords

Forest Owlet, Heteroglaux blewitti, Ecological Niche Modeling, Conservation.

Full Text:

 |  (PDF views: 14)

References


  • ALI, S. & S.D. RIPLEY (1969): Handbook of the Birds of India and Pakistan together with those of Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan and Ceylon. Vol. 3: Stone Curlews to Owls. Oxford University Press, Bombay. 325 pp.
  • ALMEIDA, C.E., E. FOLLY-RAMOS, A.T. PETERSON, V. LIMA-NEIVA, M. GUMIEL, R . DUARTE, M . LOCKS, M . BELTRAO & J. COSTA (2009): Could the bug Triatoma sherlocki be vectoring Chagas disease in small mining commimities in Bahia, Brazil? Medical and Veterinary Entomology 23(4): 410-417.
  • BARVE, N . , V. BARVE, A . JIM6NEZ-VALVERDE, A. LIRA-NORIEGA, S.P. MAKER, A.T. PETERSON, J. SOBER6N & F. VILLALOBOS (2011): The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecological Modelling 222: 1810-1819.
  • BoDBYL-RoELS, S., A.T. PETERSON & X. XLO (2011): Comparative analysis of remotely-sensed data products via ecological niche modeling of avian influenza case occurrences in Middle Eastern poultry. IntemationalJoumal of Health Geographies 10:21.
  • CHAMPION, H. & S.K. SETH(1968):ARevised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Natraj Publishers, New Delhi. Pp. 404.
  • CHAVAN, R., M . PARIWAKAM & V. BANSOD (2013): Occiuxence of the Forest Owlet Hetemglaux blewitti in Namala Wildlife Sanctuary, Maharashtra. Care4Natwe 1(1): 33-35.
  • CHAVAN, R.A. & K.D. RTTHE (2009): Occurrence and breeding record of the forest owlet Hetemglaux blewitti from Yawal Wildlife Sanctuary, Maharashtra, India. / Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 106(2): 207-208.
  • ELITH, J., C. GRAHAM, R.P. ANDERSON, M . DUDIK, S. FERRIER, A. GUISAN, R.J. HiJMANS, F. HuETTMANN, J.R. LEATHWICK, A. LEHMANN, J. LI, L . G . LOHMANN, B . A . LOISELL, G. MANION, C. MORITZ, M. NAKAMURA, Y. NAKAZAWA, J. OVERTON, A.T. PETERSON, S.J. PHILLIPS, K. RICHARDSON, R. SCACHETTI-PEREIRA, E . SCHAPIRE, J. SOBER6N, S. WILLIAMS, M.S. Wisz & N.E. ZIMMERMAN (2006): Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29: 129-151.
  • FERRER, S. (2002): Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: Where to from here? Syst. Biol 51(2): 331-363.
  • FIELDING, A . H . & J.F. BELL (1997): A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24(1): 38-49.
  • FUNK, V.A. & K.S. RICHARDSON (2002): Systematic data in biodiversity studies: Use it or lose it. Syst. Biol. 51(2): 303-316.
  • GUISAN, A., O. BROENNIMANN, R. ENGLER, M . VUST, N . G . YOCCOZ, A. LEHMANN & N.E. ZIMMERMANN (2006): Using niche-based models to improve the sampling of rare species. Conservation Biology 20(2): 501-511.
  • GUISAN, A., R. TINGLEY, J . B . BAUMGARTNER, I. NAUJOKAITIS-LEWIS, P.R. SUTCLIFFE, A . I . T . TULLOCH, T.J. REGAN, L. BROTONS, E. MCDONALD-MADDEN, C. MANTYKA-PRINGLE, T.G. MARTIN, J.R. RHODES, R. MAGGINI, S . A . SETTERFIELD, J. ELITH, M.W. SCHWARTZ, B.A. WINTLE, O. BROENNIMANN, M . AUSTIN, S. FERRIER, M.R. KEARNEY, H.P. POSSINGHAM & Y.M. BUCKLEY (2013): Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecology Letters 16: 1424-1435.
  • GUISAN, A. & N. ZIMMERMANN (2000): Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135: 147-186.
  • HERNANDEZ, P.A., C.H. GRAHAM, L.L. MASTER & D.L. ALBERT (2006): The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography 29(5): 773-785.
  • HUETE, A., K. DiDAN, T. MiuRA, E.P. RODRIGUEZ, X. GAO & L.G. FERREIRA (2002): Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment 83: 195-213.
  • HUME, A. (1873): Novelties - Hetemglaux blewitti. Stray Feathers 1: 468.
  • ISHTIAQ, F. (2011): Response to "Discovery of a possible hybrid of the critically endangered Forest Owlet Athene blewitti and Spotted Owlet Athene brama (Aves: Strigiformes) from northern Maharashtra, India" by Pande et al. Journal of Threatened Taxa 3(5): 1798.
  • ISHTIAQ, F. & A.R. RAHMANI (2000a): Cronism in the Forest OwletAthene blewitti. Forktail 16: 172-173.
  • ISHTIAQ, F. & A.R. RAHMANI (2000b): Further information on status and distribution of Forest Owlet (Athene blewitti). Forktail 16: 125-130.
  • ISHTIAQ, F. & A.R. RAHMANI (2004): The Forest Owlet Heteroglaux blewitti: Vocalization, breeding biology and conservation. Ibis 147: 197-205.
  • ISHTIAQ, F., P.C. RASMUSSEN & A.R. RAHMANI (2002): Ecology and behavior of the Forest Owlet. Pp. 80-88. In: Newton, I., R. Kavanagh, J. Osleon & I. Taylor (Eds): Ecology and Conservation of Owls. 363 pp. CSIRO Publishing, Canberra.
  • lUCN (2001):RedList Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Intemtional Union for the Conservation of Nature. Gland, Switzerland.
  • JARVIS, A., K . WILUAMS, D . WILLIAMS, L. GUARINO, P. CABALLERO & G. MoTTRAM (2005): Use of GIS for optimizing a collecting mission for a rare wild pepper (Capsicum flexuosum Sendtn.) in Paraguay. Genetic Resoumes and Crop Evolution 52(6): 671-682.
  • JATHAR, G.A. & D.N. PATIL (2011): Reassessment of the Status of the Forest Owlet in its known distribution and Evaluation of Conservation Issues: Final Report. Watershed Organization Trust, Pune. Pp.71.
  • JATHAR, G.A. & A.R. RAHMANI (2004): Ecological Studies of the Forest Spotted Owlet Athene (Heteroglaux) blewitti: Final Report. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai. Pp. 77.
  • JATHAR, G.A. & A.R. RAHMANI (2011): Ecology of the Forest Owlet: A Comprehensive Study of the Critically Endangered Forest Owlet in Central India. Lambert Academic Publishing, Germany. Pp. 198.
  • JIMENEZ-VALVERDE, A., N. BARVE, A. LIRA-NORIEGA, S.P. MAHER, Y. NAKAZAWA, M. PAPE§, J. SOBERON, J. SUKUMARAN & A.T. PETERSON (2010): Dominant climate influences on North American bird distributions. Global Ecol Biogeog. 20: 114—118.
  • KING, B . & P.C. RASMUSSEN (1998); The rediscovery of the forest owlet Athene (Hetemglaux) blewitti. Forktail 14: 51-54.
  • LAAD, S. & R. DAGALE (2014): First report of Forest Owlet Hetemglaux blewitti from Tansa Wildlife Sanctuary (Western Ghats), Maharashtra, India. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 111(2): 134-134.
  • LOBO, J.M., A. JiMfiNEZ-VALVERDE & R. REAL (2008): AUG: Amisleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecol Biogeog. 17: 145-151.
  • MEHTA, R , J. KuLKARNi, D.N. PATIL, R KOLTE & P. KHATAVKAR (2007): A Survey of Gritically Endangered Forest Owlet (Heteroglaux blewitti) in Central India: Final Report Envirosearch, Pune. Pp.60.
  • MENON, S., B.I. CHOUDHURY, M . L . KHAN & A.T. PETERSON (2010): Ecological niche modeling predicts new populations of Gymnoctadus assamicus, a critically endangered tree species. Endang. Species. Res. 11: 175-181.
  • MENON, S., M.L. KHAN, A. PAUL & A.T. PETERSON (2012): Rhododendron species in the Indian Eastern Himalayas: New approaches to understanding rare plant species' distributions. Journal of the American Rhododendron Society, Spring 2012: 78-84.
  • OWENS, H.L., L.P. CAMPBELL, L. DORNAK, E . E . SATJPE, N . BARVE, J. SOBER6N, K. INGENLOFF, A. LIRA-NORIEGA, C . M . HENSZ, C.E. MYERS & A.T. PETERSON (2013): Constraints on interpretation of ecological niche models by limited environmental ranges on calibration areas. Ecological Modelling 263: 10-18.
  • PANDE, S.A., A.P. PAWASHE, R. KASAMBE & R. YOSEF (2011): Discovery of a possible hybrid of the critically endangered Forest Ov/let Athene blewitti and Spotted Owlet Athene brama (Aves: Strigiformes) from northern Maharashtra, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 3(4): 1727-1730.
  • PATEL, J.R., S.B. PATEL, S.C. RATHOR, J . A . PATEL, P.B. PATEL & A.G. VASAVA (2015): New distribution record of the Forest Owlet Heteroglaux blewitti Kxane, 1873, (Aves: Strigiformes: Strigidae) in Puma Wildlife Sanctuary, Gujarat, India. Journal ofThreatened Taxa 7(12): 7940-7944.
  • PEARSON, R.G., C.J. RAXWORTHY, M. NAKAMURA & A.T. PETERSON (2007): Predicting species distributions from small mmibers of occurrence records: Atest case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J. Biogeogr. 34: 102-117.
  • PETERSON, A.T. (2011): Ecological niche conservatism: A time-structured review of evidence. J. Biogeogr. 38: 817-827.
  • PETERSON, A.T. & Y. NAKAZAWA (2008): Environmental data sets matter in ecological niche modeling: An example with Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri. Global Ecol. Biogeog. 17: 135-144.
  • PETERSON, A.T., M. RAPE? & M. EATON (2007): Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: A comparison of GARP and Maxent. Ecography 30(4): 550-560.
  • PETERSON, A.T., M. PAPE§ & J. SOBER6N (2008): Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modelling. Ecological Modelling 213: 63-72.
  • PETERSON, A.T., J. SOBER6N, R.G. PEARSON, R.P. ANDERSON, E . MARTINEZMEYER, M . NAKAMURA & M.B. ARAOJO (2011): Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 328 pp.
  • RASMUSSEN, P.C. & N.J. COLLAR (1998): Identification, distribution and status of Forest Owlet Athene {Heteroglaux) blewitti. Forktail 14: 4 1 ^ 9 .
  • RASMUSSEN, P.C. & N.J. COLLAR (1999): Major specimen fraud in the forest owlet Heteroglaux {Athene auct.) blewitti. Ibis 141: 11-21.
  • RASMUSSEN, P.C. & N.J. COLLAR (2013): Phenotypic evidence for the specific and generic validity of Heteroglaux blewitti. Forktail 29: 78-87.
  • RASMUSSEN, P.C. & F. ISHTTAQ (1999): Vocalization and behaviour of the Forest Owlet Athene {Heteroglaux) blewitti. Forktail 15: 61-65.
  • RIPLEY, S.D. (1976): Reconsideration ot Athene blewitti (Hume). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 73(1): 1-4.
  • RODGERS, W. & H. PANWAR (1988): Planning a wildlife protected area network in India. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun. Vols 1 & 2.
  • SAUPE, E.E., V. BARVE, C.E. MYERS, J. SOBERON, N . BARVE, C.M. HENSZ, A.T. PETERSON, H . OWENS & A. LIRA-NORIEGA (2012): Variation in niche and distribution model performance: The need for a priori assessment of key causal factors. Ecological Modelling 237:11-22.
  • SCHARLEMANN, J.P.W., D. BENZ, S.I. HAY, B . V PURSE, A.J. TATEM, G.R.W. WiNT & D.J. ROGERS (2008): Global data for ecology and epidemiology: Anovel algorithm for temporal Fourier processing MODIS data. PLoS ONE 3(1): el408.
  • SEGURADO, P. & M.B. ARAtrjo (2004): An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions. J. Biogeogr. 31: 1555-1568.
  • SHCHEGLOVITOVA, M. & R.P. ANDERSON (2013): Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: A jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes. Ecological Modelling 269: 9-17.
  • SIQUEIRA, M.F.D., G. DuRiGAN, P.D. MARCO JUNIOR & A.T. PETERSON (2009): Something from nothing: Using landscape similarity and ecological niche modeling to find rare plant species. Journal for Nature Conservation 17(1): 25-32.
  • STOCKWELL, D . R . B . & A.T. PETERSON (2002): Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecological Modelling 148: 1-13.
  • UMD (2001): AVHRR NDVI Data Set. College Park, Maryland: University of Maryland, http://staff.glcfumd.edu/sns/branch/ htdocs.sns/data/gimms/
  • WARREN, D.L., R.E. GLOR & M. TURELLI (2008): Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: Quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62(11): 2868-2883.
  • WARREN, D.L., R.E. GLOR & M. TURELLI (2010): ENMTools: Atoolbox for comparative studies of envirormiental niche models. Ecography 33(3): 607-611.
  • Wisz, M. S., R. HijMANS, J. LI, A.T. PETERSON, C.H. GRAHAM & A. GUISAN (2008): Effects of sample size on the performance of species disttibution models. Diversity Distrib. 14: 763-773.
  • YOSEF, R., S.A. PANDE, A.P. PAWASHE, R. KASAMBE & L. MITCHELL (2010): Interspecific interactions of the critically endangered Forest Owlet {Athene blewitti). Acta Ethologica 13: 63-67.